Behind every check
Swap the vendor, keep the journey.
53 pre-integrated vendors sit behind one adapter, so choosing or changing a provider in Studio never means a rebuild.
Your compliance team edits the journey, the risk model and the vendor behind a check as configuration. A change that takes a legacy provider three months takes about 30 minutes here, and every edit is versioned and provable.
Journeys, risk models, and the vendor behind each check are all edited as configuration. No engineering release, versioned and audit-logged, so the change belongs to compliance, not the backlog.
Add, reorder or branch a step in the visual flow builder, publish, and it is live for the next applicant. No code and no ticket. A legacy provider quotes months for a change Studio makes in about 30 minutes, so compliance stops being the bottleneck.
See it in a demoEdit rules, weightings and per-model thresholds across the four FATF dimensions, and every score shows the factors that produced it. That is 240+ configurable rules, backed by 209 countries with 16 indicators each, so the business runs on your risk appetite, not a vendor's default.
See it in a demoRun a new model as a challenger against live cases, and backtest a proposed change on your own historical cases before you promote it. Champion and challenger, plus what-if backtesting, so you can sharpen your strategy without touching production.
See it in a demoEvery vendor sits behind one unified adapter interface, so a new connection is days, not months, and swapping or A/B testing one never touches the journey. Provider choice becomes a compliance decision, made in Studio, rather than an engineering rebuild.
See the marketplaceEvery edit in Studio is versioned and audit-logged, and exports for a regulator in one click. Every change stays yours to prove. That is what having your back looks like.
We are testing AI field mapping in alpha, which drafts a new vendor's mapping for a human to review, and a Risk Model Copilot in beta, one of the ten specialised agents, which reads model performance and suggests tuning you still backtest before you promote. Running with design partners, opt-in, never an automatic change.
53 pre-integrated vendors sit behind one adapter, so choosing or changing a provider in Studio never means a rebuild.
A leading offshore fund administrator runs live investor and entity onboarding on Zenoo, with 55 onboarding links created in a single week and 19 completed in live production.
Yes. Studio's visual flow builder and risk model editor are designed so compliance owns 240+ rules across four FATF dimensions directly. You can add a step to a journey, adjust a risk threshold, or swap a vendor by configuration. No code, no release, no engineering ticket. A change that took a legacy provider months takes about 30 minutes here.
You run a proposed model change as a "challenger" in parallel with your live production model on real incoming cases. You can also run what-if backtesting on your own historical cases. That means you can see exactly how a rule change would have performed before you promote it to production, so experiments never touch live applicants until you are confident.
Studio is an orchestration layer that spans the entire lifecycle: journey steps, risk scoring, vendor selection, and testing are all edited in the same place. A rules engine typically handles scoring logic alone. In Studio, the compliance team can reorder a verification step, swap the vendor behind it, and adjust the threshold at which it triggers, all as configuration, with version history and audit logs throughout.
Every vendor sits behind one unified adapter interface, so changing the provider behind a check does not require any change to the journey or any engineering work. You pick the new vendor in Studio, configure the mapping, run a test against historical cases, and go live. The data contract to the rest of the platform stays the same.
Every edit made in Studio is versioned and audit-logged with timestamps, the editor identity, and the reason if one is supplied. Those records are immutable and exportable on demand. The aim is to turn a regulator request that previously required a manual reconstruction into a one-click export. Every change stays yours to prove.
The 4 to 6 week enterprise production deployment is a platform benchmark that covers the full Zenoo deployment, not Studio alone. Studio is the configuration layer you work in once the platform is live. How long it takes to tune your risk model and journeys after go-live depends on your starting configuration and your team's cadence, not a fixed number we would commit to.
Bring the cases and the journeys you run today. We will show you how your team owns them in Studio, in 30 minutes.
